Phase 1 boiler life assessment

the subject power plant - courtesy of the utility

Plant:

  • A 270 MW gas fired boiler, of once-through (Benson) type with 180,000h service.
  • After 5 years base-load operation followed by 20 years of load following, the utility wishes to run in a two-shifting regime for 8 more years.

Objective:

A Phase 1 remaining life assessment of:

  • all critical headers (22 types)
  • some internal pipework (2 bends)
  • some tubes (2 banks)

Basis of assessment:

  • Current condition (calculated life consumed)
     - operating conditions to date
  • Remaining life
     - proposed change from load following to two shifting
  • Mechanisms
     - low temperature headers - fatigue only
     - high temperature components - creep and fatigue
     - tubes - creep, fireside corrosion, steamside corrosion
  • Input data
     - actual and expected operating conditions
     - design materials data and dimensions
  • Code based stress analysis (TRD)
     - all key locations

Operational events considered:

  • Starts
     - Cold to 40 MW
     - Cold to full load
     - Warm to full load
     - Hot to full load
  • Load changes
     - 40 – 270
     - 270 – 40 MW
     - 80 – 160 MW
     - 40 – 270 – 130 – 270 – 40 MW (full 24h cycle)
  • Unit trip

Excursions and instabilities:

Known in advance:

  • Economiser
     - cold-water pull-through from de-aerator on run-up
  • Evaporator, level maintaining vessel, cyclones
     - feedwater choke on transition to once-through operation

Discovered during the assessment:

  • Superheaters 3 and 4, Reheater 2
     - Attemporator instability
  • Reheater 1
     - Bypass instability
Operational data for Superheater 3, showing attemperator-induced instabiity

Results - fatigue:

  • Two components were calculated to be fatigue critical at the assessment time
  • If instabilities have their maximum effect, then a further component was also calculated to be fatigue critical at the assessment time
  • Three components were calculated to become fatigue critical during the next 8 years
  • If instabilities have their maximum effect, then a further component was also calculated to become fatigue critical during the next 8 years

Results - creep and fatigue combined:

  • Two components were calculated to be creep strain critical at the assessment time
  • One of these was also critical with regard to calculated total damage at the assessment time and the calculated total damage was predicted to exceed 1 within the next 8 years
  • The other was predicted to become critical with respect to calculated total damage during the next 8 years

Recommendations:

  • Further data, necessary to refine the assessment for those components which were predicted to become critical within the next 8 years, were identified
  • Future inspection plans were formulated
     - Scope and timing
     - Techniques
  • Potential replacements were identified

Plant Integrity